2018 mascot gish3/10/2024 ![]() Facts Husband received an engineering degree from Rose Hulman Institute of Technology in 1982 and has worked primarily in the aviation industry since that time. Issue Whether the trial court abused its discretion when it concluded that Husband had rebutted the presumption that an equal division of property was just and reasonable and awarded the entire Hilliard Lyons account to Husband. Finding that the trial court abused its discretion when it concluded that Husband had rebutted the presumption that an equal division of marital property was just and reasonable and awarded the entire Hilliard Lyons account to Husband, we reverse and remand with instructions for the trial court to equally divide between the parties the interest on the Hilliard Lyons account that accrued during the course of the parties’ marriage. Wife now appeals and argues that the trial court abused its discretion when it awarded the entire Hilliard Lyons account to Husband. During the course of the parties’ twenty-six-year marriage, although no additional contributions were made to the Hilliard Lyons account, the account grew to $206,950, all of which the trial court awarded to Husband. Husband had funded this account with a $15,000 deposit in 1987, two years before the parties’ Court of Appeals of Indiana | Opinion 15A05-1711-DR-2628 | Septem of 10 marriage. When dividing the property, the trial court awarded Husband the entirety of what is now known as the Hilliard Lyons retirement account (“the Hilliard Lyons account”). Statement of the Case The trial court dissolved the marriage of Jamie Gish (“Wife”) and Patrick Gish (“Husband”) and divided their assets. Appeal from the Dearborn Circuit Court The Honorable James D. ![]() Patrick Michael Gish, Appellee-Petitioner. Patrick Magrath Alcorn Sage Schwartz & Magrath, LLP Madison, Indiana Leanna Weissmann Lawrenceburg, Indiana IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA Jamie Lynn Gish, SeptemAppellant-Respondent, Court of Appeals Case No. FILED Sep 28 2018, 9:28 am CLERK Indiana Supreme Court Court of Appeals and Tax Court ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT ATTORNEY FOR APPELLEE R.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |